Lior Suchard, my hero!

What a show. What an incredible show.

I had the good fortune to see Lior Suchard in action today. He was performing at a corporate event in Chennai, and I saw an article about it in the paper. The event was invite-only, and it was at the Park Sheraton. I landed up anyway with a friend, and after a lot of pleading and cringing, the organizers took pity on me and let me in, with strict instructions to scoot as soon as the show was over and not dip into the cocktails and dinner. I gladly obliged.

And boy, was I glad I did! Lior Suchard is a mentalist, known in the magician circles as Uri Geller’s successor. The show I saw today was top-notch magic. It was definitely one of the best, ever, performing-art events that I have attended.

Lior does all the regular tricks. He started off picking a volunteer from the audience and naming a person she was thinking about. He called another girl on stage, asked her to think of her first love, and wrote down the guy’s name in front of the audience. He names numbers that people think of. He draws pictures that you’re thinking about. In his closing act, he asked five people five random questions – a name, a famous person, a car, a place, a duration – and magically, he ‘materialized’ a piece of paper with a story in it, which had all of those things. This act was first-rate mental magic.

But Lior is more than just a magician; he’s also a consummate entertainer. Second to Comedian Praveen, Lior was the funniest act I’ve seen. Starting with the patter on first love – “I was in love with a girl for one month, and then we broke up. I saw she was thinking of someone else” – Lior had a penchant for keeping the audience enthralled.

Like when he did his closing act, and the famous person named was Barack Obama. He pulled out an envelope and said, “You said Barack Obama? Look at this photograph…” He opens the envelope and takes out a picture of a little African-American kid – “Barack Obama. 2 years old.” And when everyone finishes laughing, he says, “But what if you’d said, you know, maybe, Brad Pitt?” And he turns around the picture and there’s this photograph of a 2-year-old Caucasian kid!

And that unforgettable moment near the end of his closing act, when he materialized his piece of paper. The first piece of paper was inside an envelope that he’d asked a girl in the audience to keep in her safe custody before he started the trick. After he’d asked for the five names, he called her onto the stage and asked her to open the envelope, and read what was on the paper. She looked at the paper, and said, “Exactly the same!” and the audience burst into applause. But the joke was on us, because Lior asked her to show us the paper, and that’s exactly what it said: the words “Exactly the same”! And then, of course, the real paper appeared, with all of the incredible stuff in it.

Lior got everything right in his act. He had this one trick where a guy thinks of a number and writes it down on a piece of paper. Then Lior fills up a grid with a bunch of numbers and asks the volunteer if his number is in the grid. The volunteer says, “Absolutely not!” and Lior does a quick double-take. The volunteer reveals the number he thought of: 75. And then we realize that every row, every column, the diagonals, the corner squares, all sorts of patterns of numbers, all yield the same sum: 75!

The usual reaction to a mental magic performance is, ‘the volunteers were coached’. And it’s hard for a mentalist to counter that, because mind-reading is such a personal act of magic. If we could have hung around after the show (when Lior was mingling with the crowd over cocktails), I would have loved to have him read my mind. But I couldn’t – not after all the goodwill that got me into the show in the first place. Nevertheless, there’s a silver lining. During the show, he called up a couple on the stage, and got the woman to close her eyes; then whenever he poked her partner, she would feel the poke. It was great fun. But what’s even more fun is that this couple comes to the same Gita class that I go to, so next Sunday, I’m going to confront them and ask if they collaborated.

But I’m sure I know what the answer is going to be. Viva Lior! I can’t wait to see you again!

 

Woyzeck: dance, drama and dehumanization

Chennai is a hardly a blip on the radar of international theater, and so the MetroPlus Theater Fest is a pilgrimage that Chennai theater lovers make every year, to see some of the best Indian and international theater troupes in action. Yesterday, I went to a performance of the German classic, Woyzeck (by Georg Buchner) by an Experimental Theater troupe from Korea called the Sadari Movement Laboratory. It was easily one of the most incredible performances I have seen in a long while.

The play was basically in Korean, with almost no surtitles. The person introducing the play told us we would have to ‘draw our own conclusions’ from the ‘minimalistic’ play. Usually when a play begins with this kind of introduction, I know that something extremely pretentious and incomprehensible is going to be imposed upon the audience. Perhaps many in Woyzeck’s audience went away thinking just this; speaking for myself, though, this was perhaps one of the first times that I enjoyed such a radical theater performance.

SML’s Woyzeck is a play about chairs. Ten chairs are all the props that the troupe used during the play – ten chairs, brilliant lighting, and sorcery. Using nothing more than this sparse ensemble of props, the actors conjured up incredible scenes: movements, emotions, scenery, action and drama. The fluidity of the play was beyond belief: in seconds, quite literally, the stage would completely change, and the actors would, through nothing more than their movements and their chair-handling, create an atmosphere – of merriment, of sadness, of loss, of love.

In spite of the denseness of the play, there were a few themes that stood out for me. The first is the theme of the ‘cog in the wheel’. Woyzeck, the protagonist of the play, is a soldier in the army. In one of the first scenes of the play, he takes part in what appears to be a bizarre game of musical chairs: his superiors in the army move around relinquishing their chairs at random, and Woyzeck must pick up the chair and, under the order of another superior, move the chair to him. I loved this hypnotizing scene, and the metaphor of how dependent Woyzeck is on his army superiors for opportunities, and how servile he has to be.

There is also a fascinating scene about how ‘humans become animals and animals become humans’ at a circus. There is an undercurrent in the play about the dehumanizing effects of regimentation; at a ‘meta’ level, the actors in the play exhibit such superhuman grace and artistry that they are nearly circus performers themselves, and in what I thought was a very interesting parallel, life in the army – its rules, its emphasis on physical accuracy and ableness – demands the same skills as life in a circus. And perhaps the metaphor of the scene was that this is true of life as well.

The precision of the choreography, and the highly stylized use of the chairs-as-props, reminded me again and again (and quite inexplicably) of that incredible page in ‘Watchmen’, where Rorschach explains his theory that human life is meaningless and the universe is random, and any pattern emerges only because of staring for too long into what is inherently patternless:

Stood in firelight, sweltering. Bloodstain on chest like map of violent new continent. Felt cleansed. Felt dark planet turn under my feet and knew what cats know that makes them scream like babies in night. Looked at sky through smoke heavy with human fat and God was not there. The cold, suffocating dark goes on forever and we are alone. Live our lives, lacking anything better to do. Devise reason later. Born from oblivion; bear children, hell-bound as ourselves, go into oblivion. There is nothing else. Existence is random. Has no pattern save what we imagine after staring at it for too long. No meaning save what we choose to impose. This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us.

Another thing that blew me away about Woyzeck was the way in which the curtain calls were performed at the end of the play. Each scene in the play is almost a sculpture, really, made of light and chairs and a few uniformed humans. There is a mechanical element to the setting of the scene, with its motions and its arrangements. The actors are incredibly skilled at switching scenes lightning-fast, and at the end, during the credits, each character is introduced by creating, in seconds, a stand-out scene that the character appears in. These scenes are almost like vignettes of the play in flash-back. The device was so stunning and surprising that it caught the audience in one last hurrah of unbelievability, one last argument that the play was not theater at all, but magic.

And perhaps it was magic after all.

Cardboard furniture

One of the great things about being an entrepreneur is that you get to meet, even socially, some really interesting people. One such person whom I met last week is Ranjan De, whose chequered career includes design, advertising, education and engineering, all suffused with loads and loads of creativity.

When we met last, Ranjan showed me the work he has been doing in designing cardboard furniture. To be more precise, cardboard carton furniture, which is created out of two large unfolded cardboard cartons, which are manipulated without using any glue. This is like doing origami on an industrial scale.

This work was done by Ranjan and his students at the Pearl Academy of Fashion, where he taught till recently. First, Ranjan introduces his students to the manipulation of spatial structures, and concepts of rigidity and fitting. He then encourages them to come up with concept sketches, and build small, scale models out of ivory card. If these models are able to withstand load – he places his palm on top of the model and presses down, and if the model buckles it must be redesigned – the next step is to bring them to life with real cardboard.

Here are a few examples of his students’ work:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The work of Ranjan and his students is phenomenally inspiring. They do not look as furniture as something that occupies space; they look at space as something to be molded by furniture.

It is also mind-boggling in its implications. Already, Ikea and their ilk have ‘liberated’ furniture; it is no longer necessary to be very, very rich to have beautiful furniture in your house, and you can pack an entire drawing room of furniture into a lie-flat box which can be assembled in half an hour with nothing more than a Phillips screwdriver and an Allen key. With the kind of ideas that Ranjan is talking about, though, you don’t even need to have a fixed idea of how you want your house to look. Think about it: ten housefuls of furniture folded and stored in the loft, looking like nothing more than cardboard sheets, but every season you could rearrange your house by dragging out the appropriate couches and coffee tables and futons, and inflating them. And if you want a new couch or a bedside table, you can buy one – for six hundred rupees. Furniture: the new clothing.

And what better option, really, for the environmentally conscious? As whole new hordes of people move into the house-owning, furniture-shopping classes, instead of cutting down trees to lounge on or eat food off, we would just reuse the boxes in which our washing machines and refrigerators arrive. Moving house would be so simple: put the electronics and movables into the furniture, ship it away, and reconstruct everything when you reach your new house.

Ranjan’s work reminds me of a couple of other things I have seen. One is the work of my friend, fellow-inventor and frequent collaborator, Ramesh Manickam, who runs Centroid Design. A few years back, he built a reconfigurable hotel room which worked almost like a pop-up book; press a button, a wall slides, and out pops an office table, chairs and a bookshelf: instant office. Press another button, and another wall slides down, all of the office furniture pops back into various nooks and crevices, and a bed, a closet and a couch pop up: the office is now a bedroom. Ramesh’s hotel room was solid engineering, built with heavy motors and steel walls, and an ingenious creation.

And that, in turn, reminds me of Gary Chang, who, in a wondrous act of partition and reconfiguration, converted a 344 sqft apartment into 24 different rooms.

 

Now if that isn’t playing with space, well, what is?!

Mind magic

When I was a young kid, I was very eager to learn magic. I remember I even did a magic show in school sometime in my 5th or 6th standard. 

Unfortunately, there aren’t many magic shows around these days. Which is a pity because I find magic shows to be superior to  theater, cinema and live music as a form of entertainment. There is something a lot more intimate about magic, and it appeals to the imagination: it gives you the momentary feeling that anything is possible if you only know the trick. 

My favorite form of magic is mentalism. This is a form of magic where the magician is able to ‘manipulate your mind’. This includes things like guessing a card that you select from a deck, and so-called ‘hypnotism’. 

I mention this because I went for a magic show today by the 7th and 8th generation of magicians from the Sorcar family, PC Sorcar Young and PC Sorcar Master respectively. (Old magicians never die, they just bequeath their names to their successors. Example: P James.) There were several impressive acts that they performed, but the most impressive, in my opinion, was called ‘X-ray vision’. I’ve seen this once in IIT before and this time, one of my friends was called up to the board. The way the trick works is that the magician puts a layer of dough over his eyes, which he covers with a handkerchief, and also wears a black cloth sack on top of his head. He then asks his volunteers to write something on the board – for example, numbers or English sentences – and he successfully replicates them. It’s very impressive. There’s also this variant of it where he asks a volunteer to make a mark on the board, and, blindfold, he draws an entire picture around it. He’s a fantastic artist; his artwork is impressive in itself, but to do it blindfold is mind-boggling. 

Much as I liked Sorcar’s show, I prefer close-up magic. This is where the magician is standing just a few feet away, and in a gathering where there are no props or stage, and does his stuff. For example, table magicians in restaurants (who go from table to table performing their tricks) and street magicians. 

And of all of these people, the one I am most fascinated by is David Berglas. Berglas has a trick called ACAAN. This is the Holy Grail of mind magic and no one knows how to do it. It’s also called the “Berglas effect”. The way it works, Berglas asks a member of the audience to name a card. For example, 6  of hearts. And then he asks someone else to name a number. For example, 24. 

Then he points to a deck of cards on a table (which are face down) and calls for another member of the audience to come up and count out cards. The audience joins in as the volunteer counts out 23 cards from the top of the pile, one by one. 

And then the volunteer turns over the 24th card. 

And it’s the 6 of hearts.

“Any card at any number” – it apparently takes several years to even *understand* how it works. And magicians who are in the know say that even if you understand it, there’s only one man who can actually *perform* it. And that’s David Berglas.

If there’s anyone who wants to make me really, really happy, the gift they need to get for me is David Britland’s book, “The Mind and Magic of David Berglas”. It doesn’t explain how ACAAN is done, but it’s got detailed explanations of a whole bunch of his other incredible magic. 

Me want!

The Mind and Magic of David Berglas

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers